Paul, I'm not sure from your column what you think should have happened here. It seems clear that there was a scandal and someone made a quick judgment call to try to steer their company clear of the fallout. After all, even if they had nothing to do with it (I don't know if that is the case), could readers be expected to make the distinction? They didn't lie and didn't deny doing business with the company in question. So do you blame them for pulling the references from their website? If so, does the reposting mitigate their fault?
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
Post new comment