Network maintenance services provider Multiven yesterday filed an antitrust lawsuit against Cisco over what Multiven alleges are "illegal and exclusionary" provisions of Cisco's SMARTnet program.
(Cisco response below.)
From the Multiven press release:
... Cisco harmed Multiven and consumers by bundling and tying bug fixes/patches and updates for its operating system software to its maintenance services (SMARTnet) and through a series of other illegal exclusionary and anticompetitive acts designed to maintain Cisco's monopoly in the network maintenance services market for Cisco networking equipment.
... instead of making these necessary software updates and bug fixes available to all customers that have purchased its operating software license, as does Microsoft, Apple and Hewlett-Packard, and many others, Cisco makes these software updates and bug fixes available only to those customers that have purchased Cisco's SMARTnet.
These acts and practices of defendant Cisco have had the following monopolistic, anticompetitive and injurious effects in the marketplace for network services:
Competition in the market for service and maintenance of Cisco networking equipment has been suppressed and virtually eliminated. ...
Customers have been deprived choice and forced to purchase Cisco SMARTnet maintenance services over that of substantially better quality and/or lower priced maintenance services from plaintiff Multiven, and other ISOs.
Multiven fired an earlier public salvo in this dispute in September when it published on its corporate blog a missive entitled: "Anti-Competition Concerns in US Government and Fortune 500 Request For Proposals (RFPs): Cisco SMARTnet." From that article (.pdf):
Several US government agencies and Fortune 500 corporations publish Request For Proposals - RFPs (also referred to as Request For Quotes - RFQs) for maintenance of Cisco Systems networking equipment and specifically request for " Cisco SMARTnet only" ("SMARTnet" is Cisco Systems' brand name for its network maintenance service) and request that companies that participate in their RFPs must ensure they purchase the service from "Authorized Cisco Resellers" or from "Cisco Directly" Additionally, they require the vendor to provide a letter from Cisco that the vendor is authorized to sell the products required in every bid.
Headquartered in Redwood City, Calif., Multiven was founded in 2005 by Peter Alfred-Adekeye, who worked for Cisco for five years prior to venturing out on his own.
I've contacted Cisco to see if the company will have any comment on the lawsuit.
(Update, 11:30: Cisco spokesman just called to promise a statement within 3-4 hours. I find it somewhat surprising that they apparently will have more to say than "no comment.")
(Update, 2:40: Here's Cisco's reply from Terry Alberstein, senior director of corporate public relations:
"Cisco believes in open and fair competition in the network hardware and service industry. We intend to vigorously defend the allegations in this case and are confident that we will prevail in the matter.
"Cisco customers are in no way required to purchase services from Cisco. There are thousands of partners who offer service programs for Cisco products, including bug fixes. Additionally, customers who purchase SMARTnet from Cisco routinely rate Cisco's post sales support and access to our technical assistance centers (TACs) as among the best support offerings in the IT industry.
"Cisco's SMARTnet policies for servicing equipment are also consistent with industry practices for making bug fixes available. We have supported millions of customers through these programs which have helped ensure the internet is secure and can continue to grow at a rapid pace. Our bug fix processes have been recognized as among the most transparent bug list publication processes in the industry."
To be continued .... )
Welcome regulars and passersby. Here are a few more recent Buzzblog items. And, if you'd like to receive Buzzblog via e-mail newsletter, here's where to sign up.
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries.
YouTube takes a page from xkcd.
Airport "X-ray art" isn't likely to amuse TSA screeners.
Almost half of Google's products -- including 4-year-old Gmail -- remain in beta. Why?
Doing the Laptop Drive of Shame.
Bank of America to support Firefox, finally.
Top 10 Buzzblog posts for '07: Verizon's there, of course, along with Gates, Wikipedia and the guy who lost a girlfriend to Blackberry's blackout.
When not blogging, I am a Network World news editor and write the 'Net Buzz column.
The opinions expressed in this Weblog are those of the writer and may not represent the opinions of Network World.
|
|
RIGHT ON!!
good for them! ( Multiven )
we have to pay the vendor to fix their mistakes or to add security to their IOS.
ridiculous
3Com does the same thing. for software updates bug fixes 3com requires Guarian contract. same as SMARTnet.
I'm just glad someone has the resources to take on a networkl giant like cisco.
-j
Maybe CISCO will follow IBM's lead
Originally, IBM priced a computer to include software and related support (for example, maintenance, and training of personnel) thus making it more difficult for firms that specialize in software and support services to compete
In 1968 the Justice Department filed an antitrust suit against IBM. Even though the case never went to trial, in 1969 IBM decided to unbundle pricing for computers, software and support. This decision expanded the market for independent computing services companies
http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/giftfire/ibm.html
Too Funny
Peter was all but broomed out of Cisco for being a poor performer while I was there. He clearly has a grudge to take up with Cisco, and I for one hope he not only loses this case but also a lot of money in the process!
Go Cisco! Crush him :)
Ad Hominem 101
Here goes the usual Cisco argumentum ad hominem PR machine that engages in false negative personal attacks, launched at individuals or organizations that dare to oppose Cisco.
Cisco sucks!
Cisco needs to be taught a lesson. This company has a history of being oppressinve against even its own employees. Cisco sucks!
Big fix over Software update
I agree with Multiven on on the Bug Fix. Not on the Software update as these are enhancements or a new version, features, etc..
Multiven should change their statement to only Bug Fix(s).
Regards.
I guess Multiven better go
I guess Multiven better go after RedHat too then.
Cisco is regualrly recognized as one of the best companys to work for. Cisco also has some of the best support in the industry.
This case is like arguing that your car should come with the extended warranty without having to pay for it.
I guess Multiven better go
"This case is like arguing that your car should come with the extended warranty without having to pay for it."
Extending the car argument. Would you expect to have to pay for manufacturer recalls? I would consider this similar to bug fixes.
Bug Fixes and Software updates
Comparing with Microsoft, they not only provide Bug Fixes but also enhancement to their softwares and they are free to download as well. The best example of Windows XP SP2 and SP3. So Multiven, I guess have the balls in their court. And they should have, because why the customer should pay for Vendor Mistakes?
bug fixes should be free
Bug fixes should be free from the vendor. You should not need a contract from Cisco or any other service vendor including Multiven.
As for management services, Multiven should be able compete for that market now.
Post new comment