<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Citrix</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>VISA PCI Might Kill Your Virtual Servers</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/36171</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Did you know the VISA PCI security auditing process guidelines don&amp;#39;t recognize virtualized servers, one way or another. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/36171&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/36171#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16408">GLBA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/727">HIPAA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7395">Microsoft Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4543">SOX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6983">virtual servers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14290">Visa PCI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10311">XenServer</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:08:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">36171 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cloud Computing with openQRM at Linux.conf.au 2009</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/36100</link>
 <description>For the 10th anniversary of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linux.conf.au&quot; title=&quot;LCA 2009&quot; target=&quot;_BLANK&quot;&gt;Linux.conf.au 2009&lt;/a&gt;, this year hosted by the University of Tasmania in Hobart, the openQRM team contributes a presentation and demonstration about :

   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.openqrm.com/?q=node/10&quot; title=&quot;Cloud Computing with openQRM at Linux.conf.au 2009&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Cloud Computing with openQRM&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/36100&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/36100#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12803">cloud</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7628">cloud computing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/583">KVM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8269">openqrm</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:28:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MattR</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">36100 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Red Hat purchase of Qumranet hits Microsoft where it hurts</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32298</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Red Hat has purchased Qumranet for about $107 million in cash and is grinning silly that it has &lt;img src=&quot;/Micronet%20images/red-hat.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;snagged some desktop virtualization technology to  avoid partnering up with Microsoft. Qumranet makes SolidICE, a product which will allow Red Hat to deliver software to a PC (even a Windows PC) from the data center. The Qumranet team created its own open source virtualization technology, Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM). &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32298&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32298#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13328">Citrix Xen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8839">desktop virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/15747">HP Virtual Desktop Infrastructure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/15741">Qumranet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/632">Red Hat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/15745">Red Hat buys Qumranet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/15746">SolidICE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10312">XenDesktop</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:06:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32298 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Podcast: Only You Can Save The Planet On August 27th</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31190</link>
 <description>&lt;img style=&quot;float: right&quot; src=&quot;http://mitchellashley.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/08/16/power_it_down_day.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;Power IT Down Day: it&amp;#39;s a new initiative by HP, Intel and Citirx to help all  of us reduce the power consumption of our workstations, computer, monitors and  other electronic devices when we leave our desks at night. August 27th is the  day planned to observe this &amp;quot;awareness holiday&amp;quot;. Tom Simmons, area Vice  President for Citrix Federal, joins me as a guest on the podcast to talk about  this initiative. &lt;p&gt;  On the 27th (it&amp;#39;s not too far away), turn off all the power consuming devices  when you leave your desk at night. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31190&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31190#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14774">conservtion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/563">HP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14836">Intell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14773">Power IT Down Day</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:32:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31190 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Virtualization - Breaking up is hard to do</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31141</link>
 <description>Desktop virtualization concepts and benefits have already been proven out, largely through old-school remote-desktop products from companies like Citrix Systems and Microsoft. We know the benefits of standardization, managing better desktop change control, remote desktop access, desktop and data storage, and business continuity. Desktop virtualization has already begun the march to take over previous remote-desktop technologies. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31141&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31141#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8837">Calista</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14748">CTO Simon Crosby</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8839">desktop virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14749">SoftGrind Kidaro</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3326">Softricity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8840">Thinstall</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/168">Web 2.0</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5020">XenSource</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:29:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31141 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Podcast: Simon Crosby - Why Simon Loves Hyper-V</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30037</link>
 <description>In part 2 of my interview with Simon Crosby, Citrix CTO Virtualization, we delve deeper into Microsoft Hyper-V, why Simon is so excited about Microsoft&amp;#39;s launch of Hyper-V, how Hyper-V is based on Xen as its reference model, why Simon sees Hyper-V as a good solution for SMBs, whether Red Hat&amp;#39;s oVirt has any legs or not, and how Xen plans to be the dominant virtualization player in cloud computing. After &lt;a href=&quot;/podcasts/com/2008/071508com-crosby-part1.html&quot;&gt;part 1&lt;/a&gt; and part 2 of this interview, I think we covered a lot of ground about virtualization.&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30037&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30037#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13914">ce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13818">Citrix CTO</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13206">Simon Crosby</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13733">Xen Server</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5020">XenSource</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:59:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30037 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The hypervisor as commodity, the management tools as big expenses</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29955</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft quietly announced a new timeline and pricing for the Virtual Machine Manager  (VMM) 2008, the tool intended to manage Hyper-V, &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/071508-microsoft-virtualization-tool.html&quot;&gt;Network World reports.&lt;/a&gt; The company posted this information in its System Center management blog last week.  VMM 2008 is scheduled to ship  in the fourth quarter although anyone who follows Microsoft  knows that ship-date promises posted in a blog isn&amp;#39;t the same as a commitment written in stone. The last time Microsoft discussed VMM 2008, it was talking as if the product would be out by the third quarter, no later than Sept. 1, the article says. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29955&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29955#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7244">hypervisor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2603">System Center Virtual Machine Manager</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11617">Virtual Machine Manager 2008</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:13:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29955 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Podcast: Simon Crosby - The Hypervisor Wars Are Over (part 1)</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29938</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;float: right&quot; src=&quot;http://res.sys-con.com/story/apr08/554197/SimonCrosby.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;As I mentioned a few weeks ago, Simon Crosby, CTO Virtualization at Citrix and formerly with Xen Source, joined me to record a podcast. This is a two part interview.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29938&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29938#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13734">Parallels Virtuozzo Containers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/632">Red Hat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13206">Simon Crosby</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2454">Sun MicroSystems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13733">Xen Server</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13732">Xen Source</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:22:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29938 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EMC Puts Microsoft Exec In VMware CEO Seat  </title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29676</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;float: right&quot; src=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABPub/2008/02/21/2004194643.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;News from Microsoft WPC, Houston, TX:&lt;/strong&gt; What happens when your over inflated  stock price of $120 per share dips down to 1/3rd its value (and still might be  over inflated)? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29676&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29676#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5923">Diane Greene</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/800">EMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7395">Microsoft Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/264">Oracle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13477">Paul Maritz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2454">Sun MicroSystems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13478">Virtual Iron</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:47:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29676 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Limitations Won&#039;t Dampen Hyper-V</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29391</link>
 <description>Thursday was Hyper-V &amp;quot;hyperventilate day&amp;quot; as everyone reported about  &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/062608-microsoft-ships-hyperv.html?hpg1=bn&quot;&gt;Hyper-V&amp;#39;s release&lt;/a&gt;. I&amp;#39;m sure Windows Server 2008 machines all over the world will  be downloading Hyper-V via Windows Update come the 2nd week in July. You can  manually download Hyper-V until then. I&amp;#39;m excited to start working with the  final bits on my servers as well, something I&amp;#39;ll be doing after finishing this  blog post. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29391&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29391#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6979">Microsoft System Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13295">product quality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2968">Windows Server 2008</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:33:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29391 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Citrix Virtualization CTO Disputes Red Hat Hypervisor Strategy</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29271</link>
 <description>&lt;img style=&quot;float: right&quot; src=&quot;http://res.sys-con.com/story/apr08/554197/SimonCrosby.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;My recent blog post &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;/node/29120#comment-184257&quot;&gt;Red Hat Takes Hypervisor Control Back From Citrix&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; appears to have elicited a response from Simon Crosby, CTO for Virtualization at Citrix. I say &lt;em&gt;appears&lt;/em&gt; because the comment isn&amp;#39;t verified so I can&amp;#39;t attest for sure it was posted by Simon, so keep that in mind as you read this blog post. (Too bad NWW doesn&amp;#39;t use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intensedebate.com/&quot;&gt;Intense Debate&lt;/a&gt; so comments could be authenticated. I guess that&amp;#39;s for another upcoming blog post.)  I take away three main points Simon is making in his comments: 1) oVirt (a.k.a. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29271&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29271#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7244">hypervisor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13205">Intense Debate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/426">Linux</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7395">Microsoft Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13055">oVirt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/632">Red Hat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13206">Simon Crosby</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5020">XenSource</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:07:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29271 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Red Hat Takes Hypervisor Control Back From Citrix</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29120</link>
 <description>Red Hat &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/061908-red-hat-summit-hypervisor.html?page=1&quot;&gt;announced  two important moves&lt;/a&gt; this week; open sourcing of Red Hat Network Satellite,  and its own virtualization hypervisor &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/061808-red-hat.html&quot;&gt;oVirt&lt;/a&gt;. Open sourcing RHN Satellite is  fundamentally about showing the industry Red Hat is still the keeper of the open source  flame but the real strategic move is the development of oVirt. OVirt is built  upon Kernel Virtual Mode, or KVM, which is virtualization built right into the Linux  operating system, and has been maturing over the past two years. Until now Red Hat&amp;#39;s  virtualization strategy has been built around open source Xen, much like other  players such as Oracle and Sun. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29120&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29120#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7244">hypervisor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7236">kernel virtual mode</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/583">KVM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/260">open source</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/264">Oracle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13055">oVirt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/632">Red Hat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13054">Red Hat Network Satellite</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2454">Sun MicroSystems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11359">Virtual Machine Manager</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:12:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29120 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>$200?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29046</link>
 <description>Is this a sufficient budget for an organization for over 5 years?? I guess something is missing here. Shouldn&amp;#39;t it be Million, Billion or something like that?</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29046#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:32:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29046 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The virtual desktop grows more sophisticated</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29010</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Are we moving forward or backward in time? The virtual desktop is growing more sophisticated now that Citrix owns Xen and is beefing up features like its Access Gateway to work with the XenDesktop virtual desktop platform. The more we move ahead, the more it seems as if we are regaining the functionality of the good old mainframe terminal. But in this case, its PCs and its anywhere/anytime access.&lt;/p&gt;Microsoft&amp;#39;s own flavors of desktop virtualization and cloud computing have a lot to compete with and it remains unclear how Citrix and Microsoft will remain partners while also competing for virtualization market share.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29010#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8839">desktop virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10312">XenDesktop</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12949">XenDesktop Access Gateway</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:53:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29010 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Interesting</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28529</link>
 <description>VMware is still the best.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28529#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:10:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28529 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In what ways can Citrix extend Hyper-V?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28386</link>
 <description>Lord knows the technology won&#039;t be perfect when it ships, but XenServer is essentially a competing hypervisor. So what is Citrix planning that will both work with Hyper-V and increase use of XenServer? Management? Extra features? If you have an idea, spill it here or on this post on &lt;a href=&quot; /community/node/28385&quot;&gt;Microsoft Subnet&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28386#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10311">XenServer</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:09:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28386 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What exactly is Citrix working on to extend Hyper-V? </title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28385</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Everyone knows that Microsot and &lt;a href=&quot;/community/taxonomy/term/3642/all&quot;&gt;Citrix&lt;/a&gt;  are partners and that Citrix will be doing something to extend Hyper-V. Exactly&lt;img src=&quot;/Micronet%20images/Windows-generic.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;64&quot; height=&quot;56&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; what that &amp;quot;something&amp;quot; is has not yet been announced by Citrix although Citrix execs have promised that they will spill the beans when Hyper-V ships. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28385&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28385#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10312">XenDesktop</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10311">XenServer</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:07:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28385 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft &amp; Citrix Accidently Create Virtualization Battleground</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27993</link>
 <description>Introducing the &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/052008-citrix-delivery-center-gear.html&quot;&gt;Citrix Branch Repeater&lt;/a&gt; from Microsoft and Citrix. Next... the brouter and the Ethernet vampire tap. I thought I&amp;#39;d slipped into a Star Trek time wrap when I read the news Microsoft and Citrix introduced their Branch Repeater Tuesday... star date, circa 1988? I wonder how much money these to titans spent coming up with that product name? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27993&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27993#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12231">BoB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12229">Citrix Branch Repeater</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12233">Citrix XenApp</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12232">Microsoft Application Virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2288">SoftGrid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1436">Star Trek</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9459">System Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4114">WAN acceleration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3911">Windows Live</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2968">Windows Server 2008</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 02:01:45 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27993 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Three versions of Xen desktop virtualization arrive</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26899</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So, on May 20, Citrix will be shipping three version of its XenDesktop software that virtualizes the desktop. As expected, it&lt;img src=&quot;/Micronet images/row_of_pcs.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;88&quot; height=&quot;44&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; integrates with System Center. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26899&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26899#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8839">desktop virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10312">XenDesktop</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:55:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26899 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco to buy Citrix?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26753</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What would Cisco want with Citrix? Apparently &lt;a href=&quot; http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/040808-citrix-stock-rumors.html&quot;&gt;IBM and Cisco are rumored&lt;/a&gt; to be interested in purchasing the application delivery company. Citrix, which makes GoToMyPC and WANScaler, &lt;img style=&quot;width: 100px; height: 39px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/citrix-logo.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;39&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;among other products, last year got its claws into the virtualization market via its &lt;a href=&quot; http://www.networkworld.com/etm/2007/122007-etm-deals.html?page=2&quot;&gt;purchase of XenSource&lt;/a&gt;. A XenDesktop is expected in the first half of this year. With Cisco - and other major vendors - building their virtualization offerings, perhaps an acquisition of this sort would make sense for Cisco. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26753&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26753#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:30:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26753 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
