Hiccups in a new centralized voter database system in Texas are bogging down the registration process and ejecting eligible voters from the rolls, say local election officials.

The database, called the Texas Election Administration Management system (TEAM) went live in January, allowing election workers in 224 counties to log on over the Internet to input voter registration applications. The applications are checked against voter driver's license numbers and Social Security numbers, and the results of the searches are sent back to the counties.

The TEAM system was also built to store voter lists for the counties.

Since January, county elections officials have flooded the state with complaints about the system, particularly its poor performance. The complaints have increased markedly since local elections were held throughout the state on May 12.

"Technology should improve our productivity, not create unnecessary additional burdens," said Cheryl Johnson, the Galveston County tax assessor collector, who has issued a number of formal complaints about TEAM's performance and its problems in retrieving historical records.

In some cases, TEAM has required that workers get voter data from other sources, often a time-consuming process, Johnson said. "TEAM has adversely impacted productivity in the Galveston County Voter Registrar's Office as well as negatively impacted many of our voters," she said.

The $14 million TEAM system was built by IBM using an Oracle database and a Java-based registration management application from Hart InterCivic, an Austin-based elections and records management software maker. The TEAM system runs on Solaris-based hardware from Sun Microsystems Inc.

The system was built to let local workers enter voter data in a single centralized, statewide database that conforms to the federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA), according to a spokesman for Texas Secretary of State Roger Williams. HAVA dictates all states have a central voter registration repository.

About 30 counties continue to maintain a local database of voters, rather than depend on TEAM, while also sending the data to the statewide database, he said.

The spokesman for Williams acknowledged that the system had some problems during the early voting process for the May 12 election but said most were resolved by Election Day.

For more enterprise computing news, visit Computerworld. Story copyright Computerworld, Inc.