- Cool Yule Tools: 2008 Holiday Gift Guide
- 10 kitchen gadgets for the geek gourmet
- Google admits to violating iPhone development terms
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- Google layoffs: 10,000 jobs being cut
For years, Robert Wakefield and Dameon Rustin lived with the problems of keeping Snelling Staffing Service’s old, poorly designed data center up and running. Not only were the intricate cable runs and varied server makes and models difficult to keep straight, but the building itself tended to compound their management headaches.
“Our 15-ton air-conditioning unit was water-cooled, but the building [management] didn’t clean the cooling tower very often,” says Wakefield, vice president of IT at Snelling Staffing and Intrepid USA, a home healthcare firm also owned by Snelling’s parent firm, Patriarch Partners. “Muck would get in, clog up our strainers and shut down the AC unit to our data center. That was a big problem.”
In addition, the building owners would not give Snelling the OK to put in a diesel backup generator to power the data center. “Let’s just say they weren’t very helpful,” says Wakefield, who spoke about his data center project at the recent Network World IT Roadmap Conference and Expo in Dallas (see a list of upcoming IT Roadmap events).
Things began to change quickly once Patriarch bought up Intrepid in 2006. Wakefield and Rustin, Snelling’s director of technology, were charged with building a brand-new data center that would not only solve the current Snelling problems, but also house Intrepid’s data center and be ready to support any future growth.
“We had to build expandability into it because Patriarch is a private investment firm, and their goal is to buy more companies and roll them in,” Wakefield says. “We were told to give ourselves about 100% growth room.”
The downside? They needed to do all that with a budget of $800,000 and a window of only six months. “It was a challenge,” Wakefield says.
But it was a challenge they met head-on. Today, Snelling and Intrepid’s new 1,100 square foot data center in Dallas efficiently houses a variety of equipment, including:
* A total of 137 servers (45 for Intrepid and 92 for Snelling), 37 of which are new dual-core, dual-AMD Opteron processor-based Sun Fire X-series Unix servers (compare products).
* Three EMC storage systems, including an EMC CX400, a CX3-20 iSCSI system and an old SC4500, as well as a Quantum tape library (compare products).
* A variety of networking components, including shared virus scanners and Web surfing control appliances (compare products).
* A Liebert 100kVA uninterruptible power supply (UPS).
* Two Emerson 10-ton and one Emerson 15-ton glycol-based AC units.
And even with all of that, Wakefield says he still has room to add nine more server racks.
Wakefield and Rustin first visited several data centers to get an idea of what could and could not be done. They also looked at a number of different locations before deciding in January on the Dallas building. Then, the real planning began.
“Once we had the dimensions, everything else came from that,” Wakefield says. He and Ruston drew up 10 different floor plans and began calculating how many servers they’d need, and how much cabinet space. At that point, requirements began to fall into place. “High-density became a requirement; virtualization became a requirement,” he says.
Although the new data center is only 150 square feet larger than the old one, it needed to support more than 40 additional servers, plus provide room for growth. Wakefield considered going the blade server route to save space, but soon learned they were prohibitively expensive.
“Blades were pretty high cost-wise, and we had bought some of the Sun X-series boxes in the past,” he says. “They are AMD-based, so they use less energy and put out less heat. And they’re dual-core, dual-processor with about 8GB of RAM, so we could set up [virtual machines] on a good chunk of them, and that saved us a lot of space too.”
Wakefield says space constraints also led him to purchase new Chatsworth CPI TeraFrame high-density racks, each of which can hold as many as 36 1U servers. “They’re vented at the top and handle air circulation really well,” he says. “We’re on a raised floor, so the cooling comes from below, it gets sucked in the front of the cabinet and then vented out the back and straight up the top. It’s very efficient.”
He addressed the AC problems by purchasing the glycol-based units, which are completely self-contained. “Now, all of our cooling is independent of the building,” he says. “So if the building needs to shut down their water supply, it doesn’t shut down my data center.”
Wakefield has also planned for optimal power usage. A 600-amp power cabinet powers everything in the data center. “We have a UPS tied to that, and then we have a power distribution unit out on the floor in the data center that provides feeds to each cabinet,” Wakefield explains. “Each cabinet has the ability for a single box to plug four power supplies into it, and each of those power supplies is on a different circuit for redundancy.”
Partner Content
SMART Steps Toward Consolidated Workload Automation
Consolidating job scheduling into a single, comprehensive workload automation solution is a critical first step to effective workload automation (WLA).
White paper on WLA here
A Comprehensive Approach to Practicing ITIL Change Management
Read a compelling whitepaper by EMA, Inc. to learn best practices for integrating workload automation.
Whitepaper here
2 Minutes to IT workload automation
BMC CONTROL-M can put money back into your IT budget and strip the complexity and risk from workload automation.
View video here
Gain a faster, cheaper way to manage workload
BMC CONTROL-M can help you migrate to a workload automation solution to meet your organization’s goals.
Listen here for more info
Comments (4)
pacthpanelBy Anonymous on July 11, 2008, 3:18 amFiber Optic Pacthpanels Features -- Technical information -- http://fiberoptic-cable.blogspot.com/2008/02/fiber-optic-patch-panel-19-rackmount.html
Reply | Read entire comment
Very limited power and cooling as built, not too future proofBy Integration Architect on January 22, 2008, 3:36 pmThe article states..." A Liebert 100kVA UPS" ... One rack with 4 10G IBM blade centers (14 servers x 4 blade centers or 56 Quad core CPU's with two physical cores...
Reply | Read entire comment
DC in six monthsBy meatpieandtatters on December 20, 2007, 3:59 pmThough these folks appeared to get their project done in a cost-effective and timely manner, by no means can this experience be extrapolated or generalized that...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: How to build a data center in 6 months for 800,000By Elliott Townsend on December 19, 2007, 4:51 pmThat was an extremely aggressive schedule. It appears that the computer hardware, software and telecommunications were coordinated to accommodate the the modular...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments